Right to education is very much fine but without giving emphasis on the infrastructure its baseless law. It’s not going to benefit any one except the RTI activities piling more and more queries. I don’t understand why law makers fail to visualize the future impact.
What is the meaning of right to education for the child hails from where no schools are available?
What’s about the Govt. school, where the shortage of teachers is degrading the standard day by day?
Education is very sensitive subject. Any step taken without due consideration of all facts and cases, will only take us to the dark.
The standard of education in USA is the best example. They accept the fact that the student there lacks interest in Math’s and science and even the Presidents of USA have expressed their concern time to time.
We are continuously coping the western standard, knowing that they have failed. The Indian brain dominating all aspects of profession is not the outcome of these changing faces of school education.
Navodaya vidyalaya which have always topped in tenth and twelfth CBSE result all over India is in jeopardy whether to conduct entrance exams or not. The school is well known for nourishing the talented poor students for all over the country. Its future remains in doldrums. The benefit of these laws will go to the private schools and losers will be the government and govt. aided schools.
Right to education without creating infrastructure is just like allowing every one turn by turn participating in 100m race in Olympics.
Lakhs of science graduates pass, but what happens? They mostly end up doing jobs as clerks, Sales and call centres.
What is the next level?
Govt always accuses Coaching institutes and private schools for making education a business.
That might be true for some extent, but if the govt. comes up with a quality schooling system for all with the par to these private institutes. Ten only you can expect some cooling down.
But the fact will always remain that the govt. has failed badly in primary education sector.
